Home > Windows 98 > More RAM With XP V. Win 98

More RAM With XP V. Win 98


Attempts to do so may generate the following error message: There is not enough memory available to run this program. I used to do a format anf rebuild every 9 months that wasn't because I had to but probably developed a niggling fault I couldn't over come plus everything starts of If you are told by someone that the older Microsoft OSs don't support xxx amount of memory, ask them to show you proof. by skycatcher / May 11, 2006 7:16 PM PDT In reply to: Upgrade from Win98 to WinXP Let's get this straight...

at least in vista you can switch off the attempt to reinvent the wheel, in that case.I get cranky when someone changes something "because it doesn't look new enough". at least for another few weeks :) –Molly7244 Nov 28 '09 at 18:52 add a comment| protected by BinaryMisfit Oct 9 '10 at 16:40 Thank you for your interest in this I removed the extra 512MB, system booted up great! Darrell L. Continued

Difference Between Windows 98 And Xp

My understanding is that there is a 4 GB limit in 32-bit Windows XP just as there was with Windows NT and Windows 2000, and by going to a 64-bit XP Will it do my computer faster or not? Windows 98 seems to ignore it, while Windows 2000 / XP uses it.

You're claim about performance is somewhat accurate, but at the same time rediculous. All I did was boot and get online so I KNOW Winblows is not utilizing all the memory it has available to it. However, Windows 2000 Advanced Server could handle 16 GB with some fancy programming, and Windows 2000 DataCenter goes up to 64 GB by using the 36-bit addressing allowed by Intel Xeon Windows 98 Vs Windows 2000 I m of the view that win 98 is much better than win XP in different ways, as it is speedy, works more faster and gives optimum results, whereas, win XP

My desktop is a Dell Dimension XPS T700r with 10g hd. Difference Between Windows 98 And Windows 2000 Win XP There are many tweaks for WinXP on the Net ... I continue to get out of memory errors with or without a 4096mb pagefile. Both operating system must be "tweaked" to achieve the best performance (with WinXP having the most default "bloat"), and you must install well-written drivers for the hardware.

Windows 7 will function just fine with less than 4GB of RAM, so you should be fine getting the 32-bit version. Windows Xp Vs Windows 2000 Could not get XP to load on either system if the ram was over 512. That value is 80% between 0 and 4 GB. Judging from other comments on this subject, the type of motherboard might play a key role.

Difference Between Windows 98 And Windows 2000

had to use the vcache fix .. https://www.computing.net/answers/windows-95/windows-98-and-1gb-ram/170671.html They do not seem to get that people sometimes do not have the means to keep up with all the upgrades. Difference Between Windows 98 And Xp People stick unregistered memory into a board and it can only handle so much. How Many Primary Partitions Can Be Created In Win Xp My board is a Gigabyte Motherboard GA-7VA FA and I just found out earlier today that the specification in fact states that 3Gb may be installed (presumably 1Gb memory in each

I haven�t been too impressed with xp. They also mentioned that Windows XP supports up to 2 GB of RAM, noting that Windows 98 and Me could not support 1 GB of memory. The biggest reason to go with the 64-bit Windows 7 that I can see, is that it allows the use of more RAM. I'm one of those picky grouches who doesn't like "change for the sake of change". Difference B/w Windows Xp And Windows 98 Or 2000

  • However, they only allow applications to use 2 GB of it.
  • Using System Restore eats up space depending on how far back of a system state you want it to store.
  • I wouldn't.

Long story short, Windows 95/8/M will only use 128MB for kernel use and the rest is available for user. There are supposed to improve on things not make them worse. Win2k supports all win9x software, most DOS software and even some OS2 programs, so you have a huge application base you can draw upon.If you have a robust system, like eyecandy Thanks for all the links to information about previous operating systems but I'd like to know verify the max for Windows XP is 2GB.

They are not intended for heavy or continuous use. Windows Xp Ram Usage Local time:02:49 PM Posted 09 December 2010 - 09:56 AM No way is Win98 better than XP. The processor is likely a stretch, but RAM can be easily updated.

Regards & Happy New Year! - by Victor Vchache (7:36pm EST Mon Jan 05 2004) I found this website that explains the whole memory deal.

Try installing a 300 GB drive on windows 98 and see how well FAT32 supports it....Only good thing about 98 is it's small footprint. And if that is the case, WinXP may be better for you than Win2K. They will use as much on board ram (up to that limit) as the chipset (motherboard) is designed to accomodate. Windows Xp Vs Windows 7 Performance When you call one of these cells, a minimum of 8 bits is transfered into the CPU's register. 8086's were also able to use 16 bit registers, and could pull 2

I have just installed PowerDVD for my system, it was higher .01GB Darrell L. be a man use UNIX instead. Hodgin BTW (3:36pm EST Tue Oct 02 2001) That source page . - by Rick C. and win98se is crazy fast!

Check your games and other software choices to see if they are win2k compatible. XP limits (7:56am EST Fri Feb 13 2004) Note that Windows XP 64-bit (Itanium gold & AMD64 pre-release versions) have been limited by Microsoft to 16GB, even though lots of dual It's lean and mean and rock stable without any silly "features" that just get in the way. On top of that you have memory mapped devices (such as video cards, and really any PCI or newer device).

Personally, I liked it better than Win98. I really don�t see the need for memory above 1GB in a Desktop Environment unless you are running a graphical intensive video game or something. When I increased my RAM from 256 to 512 mb, I found that there was no increase in the number of applications I could run in Win 98SE after switching to I mean the beauty of Windows is that commands and function should be interchangeable but they are left out on Vista and Win7.

I have observed a 20% increase in speeds with my ADSL modem with WinXP vs Win9x, with a similar driver set. 7.) Win2K/XP support more efficient file systems, such as NTFS, I run 2MB of registered memory and I might switch back from Windows 2003 Enterprise. Maximum processes (7:21pm EST Sun Mar 07 2004) Wow. I was wondering if this programme adjusts the cache settings (whatever they are) no matter what memory is installed ?

With your specs and a retail copy, it should work. Ran great, and now I'm idling at 30% RAM. On the plus side it is very easy to configure and maintain.Win2000 is built on the NT kernel which is far more configurable and stable. It ran Windows XP just fine...until I got used to faster machines.Over the years, I added:- 256MB RAM to 384 MAX (PC100)- 120GB HD- PCI USB/Firewire combo card (originally no USB2.0

Remember the good old days of the Z80 processor? I'm curious if you've experimented with 98Lite or KernelEX?"Mickliq, I didn't want to mess with 98lite because I do not want to lose the Win98 Explorer and compromise the genuine feel NTFS is a journaling file system, and FAT32 is not. Hodgin Official documentation for NT (3:35pm EST Tue Oct 02 2001)

Page 16 of says that Windows NT Server is capable of addressing 2 GB for user space and 2 GB

Again, XP is a much more modern OS and it supports a ton of new types of hardware and features out of the box.