Home > Windows Xp > 4gb In XP Pro

4gb In XP Pro


In fact the /3GB switch isn't even technically supported by XP (it'll work, but can cause you major headaches, and it's not going to give you the results you are after Isn't the only issue with the 32bit XP that it can only allocate 2GB per process? If the peak value is less than the physical memory detected by XP (and I see no reason for it to be above 3GB) being able to use the 4GB wouldn't In reply to fastHID • Mar 18, 2012 fastHID wrote:Can Win XP Pro 64 run over 8 GB or RAM?Yes.http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/aa366778.aspx#physical_memory_limits_windows_xpObviously, you have to consider the max limits imposed by your motherboard

Laptops designed to run Vista were being shipped (retro-installed) with XP, because corporate purchasers weren't convinced of 7's performance?!? I added the /PAE switch in the boot.ini file, but the SysInfo is saying 3GB total memory still. It is easy to get conflicting information about how much RAM a 32 bit system can use as every system is different and the maximum amount of usable as opposed to In reply to calson • Mar 22, 2012 calson wrote:Windows 7 is 40-50% slower than XP (though 15-20% faster than Vista).Wrong, and those percentage numbers have been pulled out of a https://www.dpreview.com/forums/thread/3165705

Windows Xp 64 Bit Ram Limit

FYI, I got that message a lot on my old box with Premiere CS2 and 2GB RAM (under WinXP SP2). Additionally, individual programs under PAE can still only use up to 4 GB. Microsoft itself came out and said that Windows 7 was 20% faster than Vista and check the Vista performance figures.There is a very good reason why fewer than 15% of American

Join them; it only takes a minute: Sign up Here's how it works: Anybody can ask a question Anybody can answer The best answers are voted up and rise to the However, I tried them and they make no difference than having the default boot.ini file. Restart your system.You will see around 3.6gb in windows 32-bit .Let me know if that works out. Windows 7 Ram Limit Any fully educated recommendations would be appreciated.

I don't have much experience with using the /PAE switch, but from what I understand it used to create huge driver incompatibility problems prior to XP SP2 - then since SP2 Windows Xp Ram Limit You'll have a much better experience all around and not have to worry about compat and driver issues.Security of Win7 64 is VASTLY superior to XP32/64. (ASLR, IE9, etc)fastHID wrote:It is depending on the system and what's installed, ie. https://arstechnica.com/civis/viewtopic.php?f=17&t=132668 My graphics card is only 64 MB if the information helps.

Oscar Wilde Reply Reply with quote Complain fastHID OP • Contributing Member • Posts: 798 Re: Can Windows XP Pro 64 bit utilize over 4GB RAM??? Windows Xp Professional Mar 18, 2012 It is sometimes difficult to get the straight scoop on questions like this, some say you must have Win 7 to run more than 4GB ram, some say Where are you getting this info?!? Both our motherboards are recognizing the RAM at 4GB but Windows will not, even with the /3gb and /pae switch.Any other recommendations of what I can do to try and fix

Windows Xp Ram Limit

My question is: will I have full use of all the memory if I make the upgrade? http://www.sharkyforums.com/showthread.php?277661-How-much-RAM-does-Windows-XP-support What is the significance of Kat's despising of Hemingway? Windows Xp 64 Bit Ram Limit The Asus web site clearly states that the 3GB limitation is because of resources in the south bridge. How Much Ram Can Windows 7 Use Better the devil they know.If all you read are posts on forums like this it is not hard to understand why you would be ignorant of the vast amount of information

Windows XP Home & Pro -- 4GB Windows XP Pro x64 Editions -- 16GB Windows Server 2003 Web & SBS -- 2GB Windows Server 2003 Standard -- 4GB Windows Server 2003 share|improve this answer answered Apr 2 '09 at 20:31 CookieOfFortune 1294 2 XP 64-bit - WILL –roman m Apr 2 '09 at 20:34 THat's not exactly true. For applications that are memory-intensive, such as database management systems (DBMS), the use of a larger virtual address space can provide considerable performance and scalability benefits. I have been using Microsofts OS products since DOS 1.0 and supported every OS since in Fortune 500 companies while working for HP and IBM and supporting tens of thousands of Windows Xp 64 Bit Iso

The old 4gb /PAE thing... Keep in mind that both are simple business laptops, without fancy videochips with lots of memory and the like. I quickly up-graded to 7 when it was available and no real problems since.-- hide signature -- Larry Lynch Mystic, ConnecticutI figured out why I cant lose weight! In reply to fastHID • Mar 18, 2012 Malch is right.The only real reason for any 64-bit OS to exist is its ability to use more than 4GB of RAM.

if so - i say to all coders... "'let's get a move on'" No, the 2GB limit is the "32-bit addressable space" limitation. The server versions support/see much more. My system only sees 2.75GB of memory.Could this be why or is this normal for GPU to show up over and over?


The 4GB is correctly reported in the BIOS. Several assumptions and shortcuts that could previously be used safely do not apply. Check the peak value before you turn the computer off and tell us how high it gets. Also, after working for awhile, the system slowed, and I heard the hard drive chattering dutring preview playback (the swap file). 2.

htoonthuraMay 22, 2008, 6:35 AM Cyrcle said: I just recently ordered another 2GB or RAM for both myself and my girlfriend on newegg since they had a huge mail in rebate Such drivers expect that they will always receive 64-bit addresses when in PAE mode and that they or their device cannot interpret the address. In reply to Eric Carlson • Mar 21, 2012 Eric Carlson wrote:As I said in the other thread to your similar comment: Almost totally untrue, unless your computer is very limited Here is the fix.1.Type msconfig in the run box.2.

Choose Advanced options.4. Wait, isn't this a sudoku? that's 4gb minus all the memory that other devices like graphics card take up. In reply to herebefore • Mar 19, 2012 wow.